Thursday, December 10, 2009

The MLB Off-Season Vol. 1

It’s the most wonderful time of the year; a time when people from all around come together with one common goal. That goal is to make their baseball team better. Of course I’m talking about the MLB off-season. With the winter meetings coming to a close, we have already seen a good amount of movement throughout the league.

Of course the biggest deal seen this off-season so far is the 3-team 7-player trade between the Yanks, Tigers, and D-backs. The rich get richer by the Yankees acquiring 28-yr old CF Curtis Granderson, who is coming off his first All-Star season (30 HR/71RBI). This makes me sad because I used to like Curtis, and now I cannot. The Tigers get a handful of talent including, RP Phil Coke, RP Daniel Schlereth, prospect OF Austin Jackson, and most notably, skilled righty SP Max Scherzer. By giving up Scherzer and Schlereth, the Diamondbacks receive two young, seemingly solid starters in Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy. Both of whom should do pretty well in the unpredictable NL west.

Another deal on the verge of completion (based on physical exams) is one that will send Red Sox 3B Mike Lowell to Texas in exchange for C/1B Max Ramirez. Assuming everything goes as planned and both players pass physicals, the Red Sox would have to eat $9M of the $12M Lowell is due this year. Despite only playing a total of 17 games in his career, this wouldn’t be the first time Ramirez is involved in a trade for a former all-star. He was previously traded for Bob Wickman and then Kenny Lofton two years later. With Lowell leaving town the Red Sox are in pursuit of 30-yr old 3B Adrian Beltre, who has not since lived up to his 2004 season with the Dodgers when he was 2nd in MVP voting. It appears that the only other competition for Beltre is the Seattle Mariners, who had him for the past five seasons. Now if the Sox can’t get Beltre it is a possibility that they would take another look into the option of trading for San Diego’s power hitting 1B Adrian Gonzalez.

Sticking with the Red Sox, (because I like them) they made some good, and funny, acquisitions in the past few days. The first of which is the signing of RP Ramon Ramirez, only reason this is funny is because the Sox already have a RP Ramon Ramirez. According to GM Theo Epstein the new RamRam is going as “The Deuce”, a quality nickname no doubt. I like the Deuce, either that or “Number 2”(in the voice of Dr. Evil) would work as well, so long as people don’t call him poop. The Sox also acquired RHP Boof Bonser. Bonser, who has spent the last four years on the Twins, was up on the shelf for all of last year while recovering from surgery to repair a slightly torn labrum and rotator cuff in his right shoulder. More importantly, throughout his entire career Boof Bonser has been a perennial star for The Fightin’ Funny Names*. The Sox got Bonser in a trade with Twins for a BLOG player TO BE NAMED LATER.



*The Fightin' Funny Names is a fantasy baseball team I make every year that combines all the players with funny names that I can find. Former Fightin' Funny Names include the likes of Yorvit Torrealba, Yuniesky Betancourt, and Hiram Bocachica.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

Welcome to Just Kickin' It!, U.S. World Cup Draw Preview, and Some Bitching About FIFA

Sanibonani, welcome to Just Kickin’ It! I’m Pablo, and I am excited to join Blog To Be Named Later’s award-winning sportswriting team in the capacity of (one) soccer analyst. In the foreseeable future I will be writing mostly about next year’s World Cup, but also club soccer, other sports, and anything else I want to talk about. Today, we’re talking about the World Cup. Are you ready to Kick It?!

At the time of writing, there are only 190 days until the 2010 FIFA World Cup begins in Johannesburg, South Africa. Why yes, I do have a countdown on my phone’s wallpaper so that I see it about fifty times a day, thank you for asking. Also, as the Cup nears, beware of many future headlines about it “kicking off” and “the ball getting rolling.” I was going to try to make a superpun using both but in the end decided against it. Anyhow, the time to begin seriously considering the United States’ chances is now. After two years of qualifying encompassing hundreds of games, thousands of goals, and one Thierry Henry handball, the final field of thirty-two teams competing for glory has been set. The next important stage is the draw, which is held Friday.

Here’s how the draw works: the thirty-two teams are divided into four “Pots”. Each of the eight groups of four in the World Cup will contain one team from each Pot. The Pots are structured in such a way as to ensure that two teams from the same qualifying region cannot be drawn together in the group stage. The U.S., for example, will have to wait until the round of sixteen or later if it wants to beat down on Mexico again, like in 2002. European nations are the exception to this rule, since they have the most representatives in South Africa. No more than two European nations can be drawn into the same group. Without further ado, here are the Pots for the draw:

Pot 1- South Africa, Brazil, Spain, Netherlands, Argentina, England, Italy, Germany

Pot 2- Japan, South Korea, North Korea, Australia, New Zealand, U.S.A., Mexico, Honduras

Pot 3- Cote d’ Ivoire, Ghana, Cameroon, Nigeria, Algeria, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay

Pot 4- France, Portugal, Greece, Denmark, Switzerland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Serbia

Pot 1 has the seeded teams, the powerhouses of world football and the hosts South Africa. A recent controversy has been FIFA’s decision to base the seeded teams on October’s FIFA World Rankings, and not the current ones. Many feel this is in order to punish France for their controversial qualification at Ireland’s expense. FIFA have maintained that it was a purely sporting decision, and point out that the rankings would have changed due to November’s playoff matches. Competitive matches carry more weight than friendlies in the ranking system. So France and Portugal, for instance, would have gotten more points for their playoff victories than other countries like England, but only because England played well enough to qualify directly, without need for a playoff.

My gripe with the whole process is that the criteria of using October’s rankings was announced only days ago. It makes sense, but in the context of the whole World Cup, it looks as though FIFA are haphazardly making up rules as they go, which is absolutely not how a tournament of this magnitude should be run. It is reminiscent of the decision to seed the European playoffs, but only after it became evident that FIFA favorites and cash-flow-facilitating countries like France and Portugal could miss out on the fun. You can bet your ass that if FIFA had any way to ensure Cristiano Ronaldo’s pretty face would be plastered all over TV screens next summer, they would take full advantage. Still, FIFA and President Sepp Blatter’s stupidity is not new. After all, Blatter is the man who once suggested that women players dress in skimpier outfits to attract fans and raise the profile of their game. Seriously? You are one of the most powerful men in football, supposed to protect the game, not a fratboy thinking of ways to chillify the world.

FIFA and Blatter’s inadequacies aside, the U.S. has to start planning for June. Looking at the Pots, you have to say that we would love to be drawn with South Africa. As hosts they will undoubtedly get a massive boost from home support and home conditions, but they still look the weakest seeded team by a mile. Drawing South Africa will be a major boost for any of the nonseeded teams, but keep in mind that no African team can.

Pot 3 is tough. Ghana, Cote d’ Ivoire, and Cameroon all boast top players who have been competing at the highest level in Europe for years, and Algeria showed excellent mental toughness to qualify after one of the closest, craziest finishes to a qualifying group ever, their bus getting stoned, and a one-match playoff with hated rivals Egypt. Nigeria, one of Africa’s most illustrious teams in terms of history, has good players but has in recent times fallen victim to a severe lack of organization affecting everyone from the coach up through their Football Association President. I pick Nigeria as the weakest African team in Pot 3. Remember that this World Cup is the first ever in Africa, and teams playing in their own continents enjoy a huge historical advantage. That will be a major storyline of this tournament, and I think that playing any African team will be extremely difficult, and I would also not be in the least bit surprised if an African team goes very deep into this tournament. But that’s another blog entry.

Of the three South American nations, Chile and Paraguay had very impressive qualifying campaigns in one of the toughest regions to get through. Uruguay survived a playoff with Costa Rica, and boasts several top players in Europe. Chile may suffer from a lack of experience in major tournaments, despite their excellent finish in qualifying. I would probably prefer to see them than either of the ‘Guays. Again though, there are no pushovers in this Pot, and the U.S. will definitely be seeing one of them.

Moving onto Pot 4, France and Portugal jump out as names to avoid. Denmark, Slovakia, and Slovenia won tough groups to qualify and have very talented players. They should be high on confidence come June. Slovenia upset Russia in a playoff, but it remains to be seen if they can maintain that level of performance. Greece likewise qualified via playoff, but they look one dimensional, and that one dimension is defense. Switzerland topped an easy qualifying group but still look weak. I want one of the latter three.

So, my ideal draw for the U.S. would be South Africa, Chile, and one of Slovenia, Greece, and Switzerland. If we are not in the hosts’ group, as we most likely will not be, Nigeria wouldn’t be too bad instead of Chile. I shudder to think of Brazil, Ghana, and France. Whoever we get, roll on Friday, let’s find out our opponents, and start preparing for them. I’ll be back next week to break down the U.S. group. Extra credit points for finding out what sanibonani means. Hambani kahle, amigos

Friday, November 27, 2009

NFL MVP Race

So unfortunately I am not given a vote for the NFL MVP award, which is a shame because I am very smart and am excellent at making these kinds of decisions. That being said I am going to try to predict the likelihood of who the award will go to out of the four most probable candidates. Through week 10 the four MVP leaders are all quarterbacks: Drew Brees, Peyton Manning, Brett Favre, and Tom Brady. All four quarterbacks have strong arguments in their favor as to why they are worthy, and I am going to go over their reasons.

Drew Brees: (Through week 10) Comp.%: 68.1 TDs: 22 INTs:9 Yards: 2746 QB Rating: 105.8

Possibly the most impactful free agent acquisition in NFL history, Drew Brees has almost single-handedly turned around the 'Aints to the Saints in a few short years. An organization that has been maligned with poor quarterback play (the iconic Archie Manning 's 11 season record with the Saints was 29–66–3) they finally found stability in the undersized gun slinger. Last season was his most prolific season statistically in the Bayou but this season may be his best. With a talented Saints offense and a more consistent defense, Brees has steered the Saints to their best start in franchise history, 10-0.

In most years he would be the shoe in for the award, but with the competition is as stiff as it has been in years. In order for Brees to win the award he will have to secure the number 1 seed in the NFC, which means he will have to beat out Brett Favre.



Brett Favre:
(Through week 10) Comp. %: 69.7 TDs:21 INTs:3 Yards: 2482 QB Rating: 112.1

God knows everyone outside of Minnesota and Wisconsin couldn't have hoped more that Mr. Favre's 30th retirement this offseason was his last, but alas, we have at least one more to go through before he is finally gone. That being said he has one of the strongest arguments in his favor due to the drastic improvement of the Vikings. Just a season ago the Vikings' more accurate name was the Adrian Petersons as he was their offense and most of their defense. This season Favre makes them a complete team. Last week Peterson had only 82 yards on 24 attempts and no touchdowns, but the Vikes won 35-9. A game like that could not be expected last season with Tavaris Jackson under center.

Favre is on pace for his best statistical season in his career. The one-loss Vikings are only one game behind the perfect Saints and are all but assured a playoff bye. Favre may stand the best chance of all the candidates.


Peyton Manning: (Through week 10) Comp. %: 69.7 TDs: 21 INTs: 9 Yards: 3102 QB Rating: 102.8

Manning has consistently been in the top 3 of the MVP discussion for most of his career. This year is no different as he is once again leading the Colts to a perfect season with one of the least talented wide-receiving corps he's had. He seems to be doing everything necessary for his team to win, and he has been nothing but clutch to this point. He has been so money at the end of games, he forced Belichick to call the risky and controversial fourth and 2 play and his mere presence forced the Ravens to be over aggressive at the end of last week's game, which caused Flacco's back breaking interception. Teams are struggling to prevent Manning from having the ball with little time left in a one score game. So far it seems like Manning is the other candidate with the strongest chance to win the award.

Tom Brady: (Through week 10) Comp.% 66.4 TDs: 20 INTS:6 Yards: 3049 QB Rating: 100.4

Tom Terrific is managing one of the greatest comeback seasons ever after the catastrophic and nearly career threatening injury he suffered in 2008. Although he stumbled at bit out of the gate in regaining his timing and skills, he has rebounded expertly to be in the top 3 of the major quarterbacking categories. Had he hung on to beat Peyton Manning's Colts that fateful Sunday night, and if he can beat the Saints this Monday, he would be have had a stronger argument for the prize. If he can keep up his statistical pace in the wintery months coming up, and if the Patriots can nail down the number 2 seed in the AFC, then he will stand a small chance at winning the award. He is on pace to break 4800 yards passing and throw over 32 touchdowns; amazing in any year.

No matter how it turns out, for Brady to return from a destructive knee injury and lead the Patriots back to the playoffs with a division title is nothing short of amazing. He has a great team around him but he still exemplifies what the quarterback position is.


My Pick

This season is one of the strongest fields seen in some time with four sure fire hall-of -famers in the mix. However it seems like it will boil down to a 2 horse race between Manning and Favre. Both are operating at levels unseen before in their storied careers. The "value" Manning and Favre bring to their teams seems to be nearly equal. The Vikings went from a mediocre club to an elite NFC team, and the Colts remain atop the AFC with some crafty veteran play by Peyton. The Colts have locked up the number 1 seed in the AFC and chances are good that the Vikings will take the number 2 seed in the NFC. If that situation holds, I feel the award will be split and go to both of them. Co-MVPs are not rare, Manning's first MVP was a co-MVP with Steve McNair. However, if the Vikings over take the Saints and secure the top seed in the NFC, Favre will win the award solely. You can't ignore the impact he had on the Vikings in making them an elite team in only one season.



















...Tom Brady can rest easy, though. He wins the MVP of handsomeness... and the Comeback Player of the Year.


Sunday, November 22, 2009

Scalabrine Photoshop of the Month

Tonight I will be starting a monthly tribute to one of the legends of the game of basketball. Of course I am talking about current Celtics great Brian Scalabrine. This is not going to be your run of the mill, everyday tribute. I will be posting pictures with Big Scal's face photoshopped on different people and things. Much like the good folks at NBA on TNT do with Chuck Barkley's round head, I will be photoshopping him on to different photos without rhyme or reason and they apparently don't have to make sense..

Without further ado, here is the first (of many):


SCALABRINE PHOTOSHOP OF THE MONTH

Monday, November 16, 2009

November 15th, Patriots Vs. Colts





It was already a weekend of aggravation for New England Sports fans. The Celts lost some pretty terrible games against some less than stellar basketball teams, and the Bruins lost in overtime in what looked like it would be a come from behind victory because the Penguins scored with .4 seconds left in regulation. So everyone in New England was looking to the Patriots-Colts game for their solitude in what already was a bad weekend for their sports teams.

I can assure you I was nothing less than heart broken by this loss, seeing as though I hate the god damn Colts. I also despise that ad campaign whore "Seyton" Manning. So the loss weighed me down momentarily, but I've always been a man who can see more positives in a loss like that, than negatives. In all the Patriots played a better game. Maybe not defensively in that 4th quarter, but their offense put up over 450 yards against the Colts and put up a lot more points than any other team had all season on their team. We also made a few careless mistakes which made the score a lot less than it should have. For example the Brady interception in the Red Zone and Maroney's dumb fumble. Right there 14 points that we should've had. In a loss like that I look at the other team who is 9-0 and I see that they were given a gift. You learn more from losing a game when the other team comes from behind to snatch a victory right from your hands.


Many people question Belichick's call to go for it on 4th and 2 from their about their own 30 yard line with roughly 2 minutes left. It is one that should be questioned but people need to relax. Belichick knew the risk. He also knew that the Colts had freely driven that field the entire quarter, stomping all over the Patriots defense. It was a disgraceful showing of defense. All of a sudden
it became apparent how young and inexperienced the defense was all in that one quarter. Belichick at that point of the game saw how bad his defense was and he had to send a message to them. The message was that he would rather have his offense on the field than his defense because he knew that if they had to go 30 yards or 70 yards, Peyton Manning was going to drive that football field in 2 minutes the way the defense was playing. His decision was bold and it showed the Defense that they simply have to execute better in the future and that he had no confidence in them. I can only imagine how practice is going to be this week for the defense for how they played in that forth quarter. It reminded me of their play in the 4th quarter of the Denver game where the Broncos trailing a touchdown drove 98 yards for the touchdown to tie the game. They simply have to learn to execute better as a defensive core. At times you catch them with flashes of brilliance but they are a young unit and they need these type of losses to learn how to execute better.

In all of the years when they Patriots won the Super Bowl they continued to improve with every game they played. They continued to grow as a squad and execute better. This season has been in my opinion very much like their Super Bowl winning seasons with the ups and downs of the early season. The team does also seem to be playing better and better every week. While they are still making mistakes, it is evident that they are playing better, certainly offensively. That 4th quarter was uncharacteristic for their defense but it will make them learn what they have to do to make sure their team wins. If the Pats offense would've bailed them out in the 4th quarter with that 4th down completion which was also questionable by the refs, than the message wouldn't have been received as much. They would've wiped their foreheads and said "phew, we almost blew that one."

It is important that we have losses in this season as we continue to build our team and our defense. If we had gotten away with poor play on defense it would've given them breathing room to slack some more in the future because they will have it in their minds that the offense will always be there to pick them up to win the game. It was our game to lose. We had the lead and had outplayed them the entire game. Patriots fans need to relax. We're so used to winning every game for the last decade it seems that we freak out any time a loss occurs. Yeah, it sucks that we lost to Indy and that most likely they will have home-field advantage throughout the playoffs at this point, but it makes for a far greater narrative if they win in regular season and get home-field and we march into Lucas Oil Stadium and make them look like clowns during the AFC Championship.

Colts Fans, Swallow your pride for your team, cause it won't be long before you're looking at Peyton Manning pouting because the Patriots ran a train on his ass in the playoffs.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

Reche Caldwell



I was scrolling through the channels today looking for something to watch when I stumbled upon the 2007 AFC championship with the Patriots Vs. Colts. It only makes sense for them to be showing that game in accordance with the Patriots-Colts sunday night game this week. So I stayed on the channel for a little while watching a game that was extremely frustrating to watch back in 07' and I forgot how much I hated Reche Caldwell.

Reche Caldwell was the leading receiver on the team that year. A guy that not many had heard of, and basically a scrappy 3rd or 4th receiver was the number 1 guy that Tom Brady had on his team to throw to that year. Gaffney was also there, another 3rd or 4th option.
Nobody has heard of Reche Caldwell ever since this game pretty much, seeing as though he dropped multiple wide open passes toward the end of the game that essentially cost the Patriots a Super Bowl appearance.

In watching it I began to wonder how fortunate Brady is to have legitimately good receivers on his team. Not to bash all the ones before the 07 season, but lets just say we actually know their names now. I knew when the Pats finally got Moss that things were going to change. I always said that if Brady had someone like a Marvin Harrison or a Randy Moss he would make magic happen and have seasons like Peyton Manning had prior to that. In 07-08 season before the playoffs when Belichick decided to change his game plan to make games closer, Brady had the best season ever for a quarterback numbers wise. Finally he had good receivers who were known names. Maybe Wes Welker didn't have an established name, but lets face it, he is also better than any patriot receiver Brady had to throw to before the 07-08 season.



This is not to say all the others did terrible jobs, but they only did a fai
r job. You can't say that Troy Brown wasn't the man. That man could do everything, but still Wes Welker and Randy Moss are better than him. I loved David Givens and Deion Branch, but they too have done virtually nothing since leaving the Patriots. Unfortunately for Deion he has been plagued by injury problems. Who even knows what David Givens is doing. Probably wishing he stayed with the Patriots at this point.

The point is that Tom Brady has always been one of the best quarterbacks in the league if not the best. Who knows what his numbers would be if he had some premiere receivers on the team his whole career. If he had amazing ones like Peyton always has, then I think his numbers would be pretty close to his. Instead Brady just made a lot of receivers look good, when they were just okay. It is nice to see now that instead of depending on Reche Caldwell and his massive eyes, we have Randy Moss, Wes Welker and I'll even throw in Julian Edelman (Wes Welker Jr.). We have dependable great receivers that now make Tom Brady have the numbers he always should have.

PS. Kevin Faulk is, and always will be the unsung hero of the New England Patriots.



Thursday, November 5, 2009

Money Can't Buy You Love But It Can Buy You Championships

So the inevitable was realized and the 2009 crown went to the Bronx, and everyone in America sighed. The 2009 Yankees squad is proof that with enough cash thrown at the right places, a team can be fielded that will be the most talented in the majors. When a team has the most talent, in baseball especially, it is only a matter of time until that team wins. The Yankees managed to secure the two top pitchers and the top position player during the free agency period in the off season for the bargain basement price of $422.5 million. As it turns out the near-half a billion dollars turned out to be a sound investment as it yielded the desired results.

Up until this season the 2004 Boston Red Sox had been the team with the highest payroll to ever win a championship with a payroll of around $125 million. This years Yankees team will have that distinction with a payroll of $208,097,414.

This is not to say that a team with a smaller pay roll has no chance of competing for a championship, the Yankees have consistently spent upwards of 200 million dollars for the past 8-10 years and this is their first title since their new money-spending philosophy. The hall mark of the 2000 Yankees, when they won their previous championship, was that they were a team of scrappy ball players, who were brought up from within the Yankees system. The contemporary version bears no resemblance of that squad, minus the few holdovers from that one.

New York's World Series opponent, the Phillies, spent nearly 100 million dollars less and managed to have a chance to repeat as champs. The Tampa Bay Rays had a pay roll of $43 million in 2008 and managed to beat their affluent Boston and New York rivals for the AL pennant. These teams show that money is not everything, but their margin for error on their drafting and scouting is minimal compared to a team who can just patch a hole with that years big money free agent.

Ultimately MLB is a 9 team race: Red Sox, Yankees, Twins,Tigers, Angels, Dodgers, Phillies, Cardinals, and Team Du Jour (the one surprise team that makes some noise in the wild card such as the Rangers or the Rockies). As long as their is no salary cap system in place, MLB will retain this hierarchy of rich versus poor and the fans will be the victims. Parity, the accomplishment of the NFL, is nonexistent in baseball.